TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC dismissed the petition, holding that petitioners failed to justify recall of the complainant-witness under Section 311 CrPC after closure of evidence and cannot invoke inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS/Section 482 CrPC to re-agitate matters already adjudicated in revision. The court found a seven-year delay and repeated non-diligence-fourteen missed opportunities to cross-examine CW-1 after permission under Section 145(2) NI Act-constituted abuse and prejudice to the complainant. Alleged medical incapacity of prior counsel was unproved. Two lower courts had concurrently refused re-opening; no perversity or failure of justice was shown. The petition, deemed a disguised second revision barred by substantive bars, was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
