Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT upheld the AO and CIT(A) in confirming an addition under s. 68, finding the assessee's credit entries and claimed exempt LTCG were sham and not bona fide. The Tribunal held the assessee failed to discharge the statutory onus to prove genuineness of share-sale and credit transactions; surrounding circumstances, non-disclosure in the original return, unexplained share acquisitions, and evidential materials produced by the Revenue established the transactions as bogus. Consequently the reassessment/addition was sustained and the appeal dismissed, with the Tribunal treating the LTCG claim as a façade concealing the true nature of the impugned credits.
ITAT upheld the AO and CIT(A) in confirming an addition under s. 68, finding the assessee's credit entries and claimed exempt LTCG were sham and not bona fide. The Tribunal held the assessee failed to discharge the statutory onus to prove genuineness of share-sale and credit transactions; surrounding circumstances, non-disclosure in the original return, unexplained share acquisitions, and evidential materials produced by the Revenue established the transactions as bogus. Consequently the reassessment/addition was sustained and the appeal dismissed, with the Tribunal treating the LTCG claim as a façade concealing the true nature of the impugned credits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
