Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restored the appeal to the CIT(A) directing a fresh, reasoned adjudication. The Tribunal held that penalty under section 271AAB can be levied only on quantified 'undisclosed income' as defined in the Explanation, and observed the AO failed to identify entries, transactions or seized documents forming the basis of any undisclosed income. CIT(A) erred by upholding the penalty without a speaking order addressing computation and reasons as required by law. The matter is remitted for the CIT(A) to consider the assessee's submissions, ascertain and quantify any undisclosed income on the basis of seized documents, and pass a detailed speaking order.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
