Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that the support service fees received by the assessee under the Global Framework Network Agreement constitute commercial business services and do not qualify as royalty under s.9(1)(vi) or as fees for technical services under Article 12 of the India-Netherlands DTAA. Relying on Revenue's acceptance in prior assessments and unchanged facts, the Tribunal found no transfer of intellectual property nor "make-available" of technical knowledge, skills or processes; accordingly Article 12(4) is inapplicable. The fees also do not constitute taxable business profits under Article 7 because the assessee had no permanent establishment in India and rendered services from abroad. Revenue's grounds were dismissed.
ITAT held that the support service fees received by the assessee under the Global Framework Network Agreement constitute commercial business services and do not qualify as royalty under s.9(1)(vi) or as fees for technical services under Article 12 of the India-Netherlands DTAA. Relying on Revenue's acceptance in prior assessments and unchanged facts, the Tribunal found no transfer of intellectual property nor "make-available" of technical knowledge, skills or processes; accordingly Article 12(4) is inapplicable. The fees also do not constitute taxable business profits under Article 7 because the assessee had no permanent establishment in India and rendered services from abroad. Revenue's grounds were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
