Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT affirmed the adjudicating order denying refund of rubber cess paid under protest on imported natural rubber, holding that additional duty under s.3(1) of the CETA (CVD) is leviable to the extent equal to the cess imposed under s.12 of the Rubber Act, 1947. The Tribunal applied binding precedent, including a Larger Bench decision, and concluded there was no reason to depart from that ratio. Consequently, the appellant's refund claims were held unsustainable and the appeals were dismissed for being devoid of merit.
CESTAT affirmed the adjudicating order denying refund of rubber cess paid under protest on imported natural rubber, holding that additional duty under s.3(1) of the CETA (CVD) is leviable to the extent equal to the cess imposed under s.12 of the Rubber Act, 1947. The Tribunal applied binding precedent, including a Larger Bench decision, and concluded there was no reason to depart from that ratio. Consequently, the appellant's refund claims were held unsustainable and the appeals were dismissed for being devoid of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
