Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC held that the respondent failed to establish how PAN-based jurisdiction reflected in the ITBA system conferred authority absent a statutory transfer order under s.127; a system migration error cannot supplant an express transfer order dated 25.10.2016. Admitting the technical non-migration, the respondent had accordingly assumed jurisdiction solely on system records. The court ruled that electronic records do not override statutory orders, quashed and set aside the impugned notice dated 30.03.2021 and the order disposing of objections for want of jurisdiction, and confirmed that jurisdiction has remained with the ITO at Bhavnagar since 25.10.2016. The ITO at Bhavnagar may, subject to time-bar constraints, exercise jurisdiction in accordance with law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
