Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC dismissed the appeal challenging imposition of a penalty under s.114 of the Customs Act, 1962 in relation to illegal exportation of protected timber, affirming that the record establishes the appellant's role and that the declared value was rightly rejected by Customs. The court held that the Rs.10 lakh monetary penalty, already levied and sustained by the CESTAT, is adequate and proportionate to the misconduct. The HC further determined that no substantial question of law arises to invoke appellate jurisdiction under s.130 of the Customs Act, 1962, and accordingly refused to interfere with the penalty order. Appeal dismissed.
The HC dismissed the appeal challenging imposition of a penalty under s.114 of the Customs Act, 1962 in relation to illegal exportation of protected timber, affirming that the record establishes the appellant's role and that the declared value was rightly rejected by Customs. The court held that the Rs.10 lakh monetary penalty, already levied and sustained by the CESTAT, is adequate and proportionate to the misconduct. The HC further determined that no substantial question of law arises to invoke appellate jurisdiction under s.130 of the Customs Act, 1962, and accordingly refused to interfere with the penalty order. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
