Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that the assessment framed by ITO Ward 9(4), Kolkata is nullity for want of jurisdiction where notice under s.143(2) was issued by ITO Ward 10(2), Kolkata but the jurisdictional AO (Ward 9(4)) proceeded to frame assessment without issuance of a fresh statutory s.143(2) notice. The Tribunal concluded that issuance of the statutory s.143(2) notice is a precondition to confer jurisdiction on the AO; absent such notice the assessment cannot be sustained. The appeal by the taxpayer was allowed and the assessment framed by ITO Ward 9(4) was set aside.
ITAT held that the assessment framed by ITO Ward 9(4), Kolkata is nullity for want of jurisdiction where notice under s.143(2) was issued by ITO Ward 10(2), Kolkata but the jurisdictional AO (Ward 9(4)) proceeded to frame assessment without issuance of a fresh statutory s.143(2) notice. The Tribunal concluded that issuance of the statutory s.143(2) notice is a precondition to confer jurisdiction on the AO; absent such notice the assessment cannot be sustained. The appeal by the taxpayer was allowed and the assessment framed by ITO Ward 9(4) was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
