TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT sustained the order of the lower appellate authority and allowed the appeal of the assessee in part. The Tribunal held that additions disallowing job-work expenses as alleged sham transactions were rightly deleted by the CIT(A) because the assessee produced plausible independent evidence and the Revenue failed to rebut it; those disallowances were therefore not sustained. The Tribunal directed deletion of additions treating demonetization cash deposits as unexplained credits u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE, finding cash sales and offered profits accepted and that invoking s.68 would result in impermissible double taxation. Claim for deduction u/s 80JJAA was remitted to the AO for verification and allowance if found in accordance with law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
