TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC affirms the ITAT's conclusion that full-time consultant/honorary doctors engaged by the petitioner do not constitute employees, so amounts paid to them fall within the ambit of section 194J rather than salary withholding; factors included absence of fixed remuneration, freedom to practice elsewhere, lack of statutory benefits and supervisory control, and the doctors' own tax treatment as business/professional income. However, the HC set aside the ITAT's treatment of payments under the annual maintenance contracts (AMCs) and remanded that issue to the ITAT for fresh fact-finding to determine, contract-by-contract, whether TDS should have been deducted under section 194C or section 194J.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
