Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding that the imported items are properly classifiable as parts and accessories of aircraft under CTH 8803. The Tribunal found that certain components were suitable solely or principally for use with articles of CTH 88, precluding their classification as general-use articles under CTH 73, 76 or 82. The appellant's Bills of Entry accurately described the goods and supported classification under CTH 8803, negating any basis for imposing penalty. Relays in issue were upheld as classifiable under CTH 8608. The Revenue's reliance on Section XVII Note 2 distinctions was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.