Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC set aside the retrospective cancellation of the Petitioner's GST registration backdated to 21 July 2017 and held the impugned rejection order invalid for lack of reasons. Noting the Petitioner had sought cancellation and that the SCN did not propose retrospective cancellation, the Court directed that cancellation, if sustained, shall operate only from the SCN date, 26 July 2023. The HC reaffirmed that authorities cannot impose retroactive cancellation absent explicit notice in the SCN. The GST authority remains free to initiate or continue any lawful proceedings for other violations against the Petitioner; the writ petition is disposed accordingly.
The HC set aside the retrospective cancellation of the Petitioner's GST registration backdated to 21 July 2017 and held the impugned rejection order invalid for lack of reasons. Noting the Petitioner had sought cancellation and that the SCN did not propose retrospective cancellation, the Court directed that cancellation, if sustained, shall operate only from the SCN date, 26 July 2023. The HC reaffirmed that authorities cannot impose retroactive cancellation absent explicit notice in the SCN. The GST authority remains free to initiate or continue any lawful proceedings for other violations against the Petitioner; the writ petition is disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
