Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT affirmed that a subcontractor remains independently liable to discharge service tax on services rendered to a main contractor, notwithstanding any tax paid by the main contractor on the aggregate value. The Tribunal held the appellant's commission for mobilizing insurance policy clients constituted Business Auxiliary Services, attracting separate tax liability. The Tribunal noted the insurance agent's tax obligation had been discharged by the insurer under reverse charge, and the impugned demand did not duplicate tax on the identical transaction or under the same taxable category. Consequently the appellant's contention of double taxation was rejected and the appeal was dismissed.
CESTAT affirmed that a subcontractor remains independently liable to discharge service tax on services rendered to a main contractor, notwithstanding any tax paid by the main contractor on the aggregate value. The Tribunal held the appellant's commission for mobilizing insurance policy clients constituted Business Auxiliary Services, attracting separate tax liability. The Tribunal noted the insurance agent's tax obligation had been discharged by the insurer under reverse charge, and the impugned demand did not duplicate tax on the identical transaction or under the same taxable category. Consequently the appellant's contention of double taxation was rejected and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.