Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT upheld the assessed total income at Rs.1,10,70,33,060/- but partly allowed the assessee's appeal: it directed the AO to reduce an inadvertently offered additional income of Rs.1.14 crore (pertaining to AY 2010-11) from the assessment, and ordered deletion of a duplicate addition in AY 2010-11 which would have resulted in double taxation. The Tribunal affirmed that declared return income cannot be reduced. It allowed deduction of losses on forward commodity contracts as business expenditure under s.37(1) (held to be non-speculative hedging), and upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions disallowing revenue appeals against characterization of loan processing charges and foreign-currency hedging premium. Revenue's grounds were dismissed.
The ITAT upheld the assessed total income at Rs.1,10,70,33,060/- but partly allowed the assessee's appeal: it directed the AO to reduce an inadvertently offered additional income of Rs.1.14 crore (pertaining to AY 2010-11) from the assessment, and ordered deletion of a duplicate addition in AY 2010-11 which would have resulted in double taxation. The Tribunal affirmed that declared return income cannot be reduced. It allowed deduction of losses on forward commodity contracts as business expenditure under s.37(1) (held to be non-speculative hedging), and upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions disallowing revenue appeals against characterization of loan processing charges and foreign-currency hedging premium. Revenue's grounds were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
