TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC held that it possessed jurisdiction to supervise and substitute the Special Committee and to define its mandate in the company petition concerning the mutual fund scheme administered by the ex-management respondents. The court found systemic irregularities, rejected the ex-management's objection to maintainability, set aside the rejection order dated 29 Nov 2023 and remitted the anonymized claimant's application for fresh consideration by the authority designated under this judgment. The interim embargo against payments to the ex-management was not impliedly merged into the final order of 29 May 2013 and continues to restrain disbursements to those parties. The court directed priority disbursement to retail/unrelated investors, required unclaimed redemption proceeds to be transferred to the Investor Protection and Education Fund, and disposed of the applications.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
