Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC dismissed the Appellant's challenge for non-payment of the statutory pre-deposit under s.129E, Customs Act, 1962, holding that post-2014 amendment the pre-deposit is mandatory and CESTAT lacks jurisdiction to admit appeals without it; the court affirmed that writ jurisdiction to waive the pre-deposit exists only in rare, exceptional circumstances and declined relief on that ground. Noting pleaded financial distress, the HC granted conditional relief: the Appellant is permitted six months to remit Rs. 23,88,667 as the pre-deposit to CESTAT, upon which the appeal will be restored to its original position. Failing payment within the prescribed period, the appeal remains dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
