Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT held that the assessment order dated 28.09.2021 passed by the AO under s.143(3) read with s.254 (or alternatively noted as r.w.s.254) was time-barred and invalid. The Tribunal found the fresh assessment mandate arose on 17.05.2019 and, applying the first proviso to s.153(3), required completion within 12 months from the end of the FY in which the tribunal order was rendered (limitation expiring 31.03.2021). Temporary timeline extensions related to COVID-19 could not revive an otherwise barred assessment. Consequently the s.143(3) assessment dated 28.09.2021 was quashed and the appeal allowed in favour of the assessee.
The ITAT held that the assessment order dated 28.09.2021 passed by the AO under s.143(3) read with s.254 (or alternatively noted as r.w.s.254) was time-barred and invalid. The Tribunal found the fresh assessment mandate arose on 17.05.2019 and, applying the first proviso to s.153(3), required completion within 12 months from the end of the FY in which the tribunal order was rendered (limitation expiring 31.03.2021). Temporary timeline extensions related to COVID-19 could not revive an otherwise barred assessment. Consequently the s.143(3) assessment dated 28.09.2021 was quashed and the appeal allowed in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
