Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned AA order directing reversal of Rs.1,58,59,294 margin money to the CD. The Tribunal held the margin deposit, held as an earmarked trust to secure BGs and appropriated upon invocation by the beneficiary prior to initiation of CIRP, was not an asset of the CD under the IBC and did not attract the moratorium under s.14. The Bank's appropriation pursuant to the Facility Agreement was therefore lawful. Further, because the Bank's verified claim formed part of an approved resolution plan, the AA exceeded its jurisdiction in attempting to alter the plan's terms; the direction for reversal was struck down.
NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned AA order directing reversal of Rs.1,58,59,294 margin money to the CD. The Tribunal held the margin deposit, held as an earmarked trust to secure BGs and appropriated upon invocation by the beneficiary prior to initiation of CIRP, was not an asset of the CD under the IBC and did not attract the moratorium under s.14. The Bank's appropriation pursuant to the Facility Agreement was therefore lawful. Further, because the Bank's verified claim formed part of an approved resolution plan, the AA exceeded its jurisdiction in attempting to alter the plan's terms; the direction for reversal was struck down.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.