HC allowed the petition and declared the encumbrance entry on...
Liquidator's vesting bars third-party claims; encumbrance entry declared ineffective; liquidation and distribution under IBC S.33(5), S.53 and S.247 upheld
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
HC allowed the petition and declared the encumbrance entry on the corporate debtor's property ineffective. The court held that following the NCLT's liquidation order and appointment of a liquidator under the IBC, assets vested with the liquidator and third-party proceedings against the corporate debtor were barred by S.33(5). The liquidator's admission of the tax claim and the subsequent sale free of encumbrances rendered the red-entry charge in the revenue record nugatory. The petition was permitted to give effect to liquidation administration and distribution in accordance with S.53 of the IBC, noting the available efficacious remedy by appeal under S.247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code to the SDM.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.