Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT upheld that additions under section 69C were predicated on non-availability and doubtful identity of five suppliers, lack of evidence of delivery and commercial substance, and unexamined GST input tax credit (ITC) implications. The Tribunal restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication limited to reconciling ITC claimed under the GST law in respect of the impugned purchases, including obtaining GST return and ITC status of the five suppliers from GST authorities if necessary, and examining how any denial of ITC affects commercial rationality and the assessee's claimed transactions. Appeal of the Revenue allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT upheld that additions under section 69C were predicated on non-availability and doubtful identity of five suppliers, lack of evidence of delivery and commercial substance, and unexamined GST input tax credit (ITC) implications. The Tribunal restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication limited to reconciling ITC claimed under the GST law in respect of the impugned purchases, including obtaining GST return and ITC status of the five suppliers from GST authorities if necessary, and examining how any denial of ITC affects commercial rationality and the assessee's claimed transactions. Appeal of the Revenue allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.