Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC held that the reassessment order dated 13.07.2022 under s.148A(d) and the consequential notice under s.148 are void for want of valid prior sanction under s.151(ii); the AO assumed jurisdiction after the three-year period expired but obtained approval from an authority specified under s.151(i) instead of the higher authority mandated by s.151(ii), thereby vitiating jurisdiction. Applying the substituted provisions and the statutory timeline (including TOLA relief), the Court quashed and set aside the impugned order and notice and allowed the assessee's appeal.
HC held that the reassessment order dated 13.07.2022 under s.148A(d) and the consequential notice under s.148 are void for want of valid prior sanction under s.151(ii); the AO assumed jurisdiction after the three-year period expired but obtained approval from an authority specified under s.151(i) instead of the higher authority mandated by s.151(ii), thereby vitiating jurisdiction. Applying the substituted provisions and the statutory timeline (including TOLA relief), the Court quashed and set aside the impugned order and notice and allowed the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
