Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of an addition where the assessee wrote off sundry advances to its subsidiary, concluding the advances and share capital were integrally connected to the assessee's hospitality business transferred to the subsidiary. The Tribunal found the write-off incurred in the relevant assessment year, attributable to business exigencies (pandemic-related slowdown), and therefore deductible under s.37(1) as a business loss and alternatively under s.36(1)(vii) as bad debt (part of which had been offered as income). The AO's contention that the advances lacked nexus with business or were merely capital liabilities was rejected; the ITAT found no infirmity in CIT(A)'s order.
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of an addition where the assessee wrote off sundry advances to its subsidiary, concluding the advances and share capital were integrally connected to the assessee's hospitality business transferred to the subsidiary. The Tribunal found the write-off incurred in the relevant assessment year, attributable to business exigencies (pandemic-related slowdown), and therefore deductible under s.37(1) as a business loss and alternatively under s.36(1)(vii) as bad debt (part of which had been offered as income). The AO's contention that the advances lacked nexus with business or were merely capital liabilities was rejected; the ITAT found no infirmity in CIT(A)'s order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.