TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The NCLAT dismissed the appeals for failure to condone delays of 240 and 190 days in refiling, holding that the applicants did not demonstrate sufficient cause or due diligence in curing repeated minor defects. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of balancing leniency with the strict timelines mandated by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Grounds such as the birth of a clerk's child and office relocation with misplaced files were found to be unmeritorious and indicative of negligence rather than circumstances beyond control. The repetitive nature of defects and the protracted delay in rectifying them reflected a lack of earnest effort. Allowing such delays without adequate justification would undermine the time-bound insolvency resolution process. Consequently, the tribunal refused condonation of delay and dismissed the appeals.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
