Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The HC declined to entertain the petition under Article 227, holding that the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy under Section 107 of the GST Act. The challenge concerned disallowance of input tax credit due to alleged non-application of mind and violation of natural justice principles. The court noted the petitioner failed to request copies of documents referenced in the show-cause notice and impugned order. The respondent's order considered the non-existence of suppliers and non-payment of tax by them, concluding the petitioner did not substantiate the movement of goods. Given the fraudulent GST numbers used by suppliers, the petitioner was directed to raise all grievances before the designated Appellate Authority. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for lack of maintainability, with the petitioner relegated to the statutory remedy under Section 107.