TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC upheld the application of deemed dividend provisions under Section 2(22)(e) where the advance granted by the company to the shareholder was not utilized for executing any business transaction. The court emphasized that exclusion from deemed dividend treatment requires proof that the advance was actually used for business purposes, not merely given for such purposes. The Assessee's admission that the advance was used to pay Income-tax under KVSS, rather than for job work, confirmed the advance's classification as deemed dividend. Repayment within the same financial year or maintenance of running accounts and ongoing business transactions did not negate this conclusion. Concurrent factual findings across multiple orders were affirmed, and the HC declined to interfere under appellate jurisdiction, ruling in favor of the Revenue.
TaxTMI 