Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The CESTAT held that a refund claim of customs duty paid cannot be denied solely on the ground that modification of self-assessment is permissible only under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court's ruling clarifying that refund claims require modification of the assessment order by appropriate proceedings, which may include Section 128 or other relevant provisions. The original authority's restrictive interpretation was found to be legally incorrect. Consequently, the appellant was entitled to the refund amounts claimed. The impugned order denying the refund was set aside and the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT held that a refund claim of customs duty paid cannot be denied solely on the ground that modification of self-assessment is permissible only under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court's ruling clarifying that refund claims require modification of the assessment order by appropriate proceedings, which may include Section 128 or other relevant provisions. The original authority's restrictive interpretation was found to be legally incorrect. Consequently, the appellant was entitled to the refund amounts claimed. The impugned order denying the refund was set aside and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
