Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The CESTAT held that the short payment of CVD assessed on transaction value rather than RSP was approved by the Customs authorities prior to clearance, rendering the subsequent show cause notice unsustainable. The appellant did not suppress any material facts nor possess mens rea to evade duty. The penalty imposed on the appellant CHA was quashed due to lack of evidence of personal involvement or intent, and because the matter was one of legal interpretation rather than deliberate concealment. The show cause notice was also barred by limitation, as the extended period did not apply where facts were known at the time of clearance. Consequently, the penalty order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
The CESTAT held that the short payment of CVD assessed on transaction value rather than RSP was approved by the Customs authorities prior to clearance, rendering the subsequent show cause notice unsustainable. The appellant did not suppress any material facts nor possess mens rea to evade duty. The penalty imposed on the appellant CHA was quashed due to lack of evidence of personal involvement or intent, and because the matter was one of legal interpretation rather than deliberate concealment. The show cause notice was also barred by limitation, as the extended period did not apply where facts were known at the time of clearance. Consequently, the penalty order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.