Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The AT upheld the validity of the provisional attachment order under the PBPT Act over cash seized from the appellant, holding that unaccounted cash qualifies as movable benami property under Section 2(26) and Section 2(8) of the Act. The tribunal rejected the appellant's contention that a benami transaction requires three parties, affirming that only a benamidar and beneficial owner are necessary. The appellant's failure to substantiate the source of Rs. 1.84 crore seized and reliance on inconsistent statements, including under Section 131 of the Income Tax Act, led to the conclusion that Section 2(9)(D) applies. Filing of ITRs was held insufficient to exclude applicability of the PBPT Act, as unexplained income remains subject to confiscation irrespective of tax compliance. Consequently, the attachment and proceedings under the PBPT Act were affirmed against the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.