Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC set aside the impugned orders dated 18.02.2021, 28.10.2020, and 27.01.2021 passed by the respective respondents concerning revised refund claims barred by limitation under Notification No. 02/2019-CT. The court held that the applicability of the Apex Court's suo motu judgment, Circular No. 157/13/2021-GST, and Notification No. 13/2020 CT requires reconsideration. Consequently, all three matters were remanded to the First Appellate Authority for fresh adjudication in light of the recent legal developments. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly, with liberty granted to the respondents to raise any grounds in future writ petitions or proceedings. The petition was allowed in part.
The HC set aside the impugned orders dated 18.02.2021, 28.10.2020, and 27.01.2021 passed by the respective respondents concerning revised refund claims barred by limitation under Notification No. 02/2019-CT. The court held that the applicability of the Apex Court's suo motu judgment, Circular No. 157/13/2021-GST, and Notification No. 13/2020 CT requires reconsideration. Consequently, all three matters were remanded to the First Appellate Authority for fresh adjudication in light of the recent legal developments. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly, with liberty granted to the respondents to raise any grounds in future writ petitions or proceedings. The petition was allowed in part.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
