Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The HC upheld the Tribunal's findings on multiple issues, ruling largely against the revenue. Foreign commission payments without supporting evidence were held not taxable in India, consistent with established precedent and statutory provisions limiting income deemed to accrue in India. Market-to-market losses on forward contracts were not disallowed, reaffirming the AO's independence against CBDT instructions. Liquidated damages received for delayed delivery of capital assets were classified as capital receipts, not business income. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was sustained, as the assessee accounted for all investments capable of yielding exempt income. Advances written off to farmers required no interference, aligning with CIT(A) findings. Set-off of interest paid against interest received from the same party was allowed. Patent registration charges were held to be revenue expenditure, as were legal expenses incurred to protect business interests. All substantial questions of law were answered against the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.