Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC upheld the Tribunal's findings on multiple issues, ruling largely against the revenue. Foreign commission payments without supporting evidence were held not taxable in India, consistent with established precedent and statutory provisions limiting income deemed to accrue in India. Market-to-market losses on forward contracts were not disallowed, reaffirming the AO's independence against CBDT instructions. Liquidated damages received for delayed delivery of capital assets were classified as capital receipts, not business income. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was sustained, as the assessee accounted for all investments capable of yielding exempt income. Advances written off to farmers required no interference, aligning with CIT(A) findings. Set-off of interest paid against interest received from the same party was allowed. Patent registration charges were held to be revenue expenditure, as were legal expenses incurred to protect business interests. All substantial questions of law were answered against the revenue.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
