Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee-trust, holding that it qualifies for registration under section 80G despite having some religious objects. The tribunal found the trust to be a composite religious-cum-charitable trust, with primary activities including running Annakshetra, Atithigruh, Gaushala, providing medical relief, and arranging mass marriages for the needy. The expenditure on religious activities was less than 5% of the total income, meeting the threshold under section 80G(5B), which permits registration if religious expenditure does not exceed 5% of income. The trust's funds were exclusively applied to charitable activities, and it submitted sufficient evidence to establish the genuineness of its activities. Consequently, the trust was deemed eligible for the benefits under section 80G, and the appeal was allowed.