Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The AT dismissed the appeal concerning attachment of property under the PMLA related to scheduled offences involving falsified financial statements and conspiracy. It was established that a portion of the purchase consideration for the property originated from proceeds of crime traced to inflated share sales. The tribunal emphasized that proceeds of crime encompass property equivalent in value to criminally derived assets, regardless of legitimate income sources. The failure to provide an opportunity of hearing under Section 8 of the PMLA was noted but did not alter the outcome. The tribunal rejected the contention that SARFAESI Act supersedes PMLA, affirming their distinct objectives. Consequently, the attachment order was upheld, confirming the property as proceeds of crime and dismissing the appeal.