Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order confirming recovery of duty on allegations of overvaluation and obtaining DEPB scripts in excess. The Tribunal held that the Customs authorities lacked jurisdiction under Section 28 of the Customs Act to recover alleged overvaluation related to DEPB credits. It was emphasized that only the DGFT has authority to initiate proceedings for recovery of excess DEPB credit claims. Since DGFT neither accepted the Department's allegations nor initiated action, the recovery demand by Customs was impermissible. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned recovery order was quashed.