Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT held that the adjustment relating to employees' contributions amounting to Rs. 6.69 lakhs was unjustified since the assessee had not claimed deduction under section 80C in earlier years, thereby negating the applicability of Rule 9 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule. Consequently, the addition on this account was deleted. However, withdrawals from the EPF account, including interest on employee contributions, were taxable as the assessee did not satisfy the five-year qualifying period. Items already offered to tax in the return were accepted, and the adjustment relating to the taxable withdrawal was upheld. Thus, the tribunal allowed deletion of the addition concerning unclaimed 80C deductions but confirmed taxability of EPF withdrawals and related interest.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
