Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of ITC and the consequent recovery with interest and penalty, noting the petitioner firm was non-existent and non-operational at the registered premises. The court held that factual disputes regarding the petitioner's role, justification of penalty imposition, and proportionality of penalty under Sections 122(1) and 122(3) of the CGST Act fall outside its writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was directed to pursue the alternative remedy by filing an appeal before the designated appellate authority under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, by the stipulated deadline, accompanied by the requisite pre-deposit. The petition was accordingly disposed of for lack of maintainability.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
