Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The NCLAT upheld the maintainability of the Section 7 application, determining that the amount advanced by Respondent No. 1 constituted a financial debt rather than an operational debt. The agreement evidenced a financial contribution of Rs. 35 lakh secured by a demand promissory note with interest, intended to support the corporate debtor's business expansion and procurement of specialized equipment, not for purchase of goods or services. The tribunal rejected the appellant's argument that the debt related to operational activities, emphasizing the need to ascertain the true nature of the transaction. Consequently, the impugned order was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
