TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC upheld the validity of the Notice issued under Section 148 of the IT Act following compliance with procedural safeguards under Section 148A, including prior approval from the competent authority. The Court held that the Assessing Officer acted within jurisdiction upon finding escapement of income potentially exceeding the Rs. 50 lakh threshold, despite the initial quantified amount being lower. The petitioner's contention that the Notice was premature or invalid was rejected, as the statutory scheme provides adequate opportunity for adjudication and appeal. Interference via writ petition at the notice stage was deemed premature and contrary to settled principles, as the matter requires detailed examination during assessment proceedings. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the reopening of assessment was dismissed, affirming the procedural and substantive correctness of the reassessment initiation.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
