Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
The HC held that the failure to provide the petitioner the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses whose statements were relied upon under the CGST Act violated the principles of natural justice. Cross-examination, as mandated by the Evidence Act and affirmed by the Apex Court, is integral to ensuring a fair hearing. Consequently, the court set aside the levy of tax and penalty and remanded the matter back to the authority for further proceedings, specifically directing that cross-examination be allowed. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC held that the failure to provide the petitioner the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses whose statements were relied upon under the CGST Act violated the principles of natural justice. Cross-examination, as mandated by the Evidence Act and affirmed by the Apex Court, is integral to ensuring a fair hearing. Consequently, the court set aside the levy of tax and penalty and remanded the matter back to the authority for further proceedings, specifically directing that cross-examination be allowed. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
