Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The CESTAT held that confiscation of export goods, duly cleared with appropriate customs duties and not prohibited for export, was unjustified under Section 51 of the Customs Act, 1962. The proceedings aimed solely to deny benefits under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), without allegations of non-export, substandard quality, or undervaluation. The Tribunal clarified that the ITC (HS) Code used in FTP is a directory and not a statutory basis for customs assessment or penalty. The reassessment of ITC (HS) Codes in shipping bills lacked legal authority, rendering the denial of MEIS benefits invalid. Consequently, the impugned order was quashed, and the appeal was allowed, restoring the appellant's entitlement to export promotion benefits.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
