Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The SC dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation, affirming that the NCLAT correctly declined to condone a 283-day delay in filing the appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Court emphasized that the NCLAT acted within its jurisdiction and did not err in refusing to extend the limitation period. The appellant, despite being a statutory authority, failed to adhere to prescribed timelines and also incurred a further 147-day delay in approaching the SC. Consequently, the appeal was rejected both on grounds of inordinate delay and lack of merit.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
