TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC dismissed the petition seeking waiver of the pre-deposit requirement under the third proviso to Section 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act, affirming that the borrower must deposit 25% of the debt, including interest up to the appeal's institution date before the DRAT. The borrower failed to produce evidence negating the classification of the loan as an NPA or establish any financial hardship. Alleged accounting errors and partial payments post-Section 13(2) notice were insufficient to demonstrate a prima facie case or justify waiver. The Court held that reliance on a typographical error in loan documents did not warrant interference with the DRAT's dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with pre-deposit directions. Exercising discretionary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution was deemed inappropriate as the borrower showed no bona fide intention to repay the debt. The petition was accordingly dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
