Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC held that the petitioner's payment of the third installment under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, was effectively made on or before the due date despite the delayed credit in the treasury's account. The petitioner deposited the amount with a cooperative bank by the deadline, and the subsequent delay in transfer to the respondent's account was attributable to interbank processing, not petitioner's fault. Consequently, the petitioner was entitled to the benefits of the Scheme, and the rejection of the application and non-issuance of Form 4 were set aside. The petitions were allowed.
The HC held that the petitioner's payment of the third installment under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, was effectively made on or before the due date despite the delayed credit in the treasury's account. The petitioner deposited the amount with a cooperative bank by the deadline, and the subsequent delay in transfer to the respondent's account was attributable to interbank processing, not petitioner's fault. Consequently, the petitioner was entitled to the benefits of the Scheme, and the rejection of the application and non-issuance of Form 4 were set aside. The petitions were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
