TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC upheld the provisional attachment order under PMLA despite properties being purchased in 2003 while predicate offences were registered via FIRs only in 2010. The Court found that the Appellant had engaged in continuing unlawful activities since 1997 as part of an organized criminal syndicate, generating approximately Rs. 1.5 crores through immoral trafficking of women. Investigation revealed the Appellant's declared income of Rs. 2,38,720 was insufficient to support investments of Rs. 1.88 lakhs in properties and other assets. The Court concluded that the timing of FIR registration was irrelevant given the Appellant's established criminal history and inability to provide satisfactory explanation for legal income sources. The Appellate Tribunal's determination that attached properties constituted proceeds of crime was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
