Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
ITAT remanded matter to AO for verification of agricultural land's distance from GHMC municipal limits as of sale date 07.09.2007. Land constitutes capital asset under Section 2(14)(iii)(b) if within 8 km radius of notified municipality. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s allowance of Section 54F exemption but clarified investment deadline extends to delayed return filing date under Section 139(4), not merely due date. Section 54B exemption properly restricted to registered sale deed values, rejecting higher agreement amounts. Cost of improvement deduction denied due to insufficient substantiation beyond rough notebook entries. AO directed to allow investments made up to delayed return filing date and verify land distance for capital asset determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.