Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT remanded matter to AO for verification of agricultural land's distance from GHMC municipal limits as of sale date 07.09.2007. Land constitutes capital asset under Section 2(14)(iii)(b) if within 8 km radius of notified municipality. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s allowance of Section 54F exemption but clarified investment deadline extends to delayed return filing date under Section 139(4), not merely due date. Section 54B exemption properly restricted to registered sale deed values, rejecting higher agreement amounts. Cost of improvement deduction denied due to insufficient substantiation beyond rough notebook entries. AO directed to allow investments made up to delayed return filing date and verify land distance for capital asset determination.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
