Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
ITAT upheld TPO's recharacterization of Appellant's engineering design services as Knowledge Process Outsourcing (KPO) rather than Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), finding the services involved highly technical work including 3D modelling, technical specifications, and structural analysis requiring specialized technical staff. Regarding comparable selection, ITAT upheld inclusion of Mahindra Consulting Engineers Ltd despite Appellant's RPT filter objections, but directed exclusion of Genesys International Corporation Ltd and L&T Technologies Services Ltd as functionally dissimilar. ITAT confirmed consultancy charges as operating costs but directed exclusion of goodwill amortization from operating expenses. Capacity utilization adjustment was rejected due to insufficient evidence. ITAT dismissed Appellant's challenge regarding inclusion of Code Ploy Engg. Ltd and E2G Engineering & Design Services Pvt Ltd as no grounds were raised before TPO/DRP. Appeal was partly allowed.