Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT held that customs duty under section 14 of the Customs Act can be determined based on transaction value reflected in invoices retrieved from importer's email account, even when different invoice was filed with Bill of Entry. The Larger Bench rejected the Division Bench's earlier ruling that emails found in importer's private capacity cannot substantiate mis-declaration cases. Court reasoned that Customs Act and 2007 Valuation Rules permit proper officer to consider email invoices for verification under section 46, and after rejecting declared transaction value, re-determination can proceed through rules 4-9. Since identical/similar goods' transaction values can be considered, email invoices for same consignment hold greater relevance. Appeals remanded to Division Bench for merit-based adjudication.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
