Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC allowed petition filed by NRI petitioner seeking TDS refund despite delayed ITR filing. Petitioner, residing in London and Northern Ireland with OCI status, contended Covid-19 pandemic and travel restrictions prevented timely consultation with Indian tax advisors for filing returns. Court held respondent failed to consider petitioner's non-resident status and genuine hardship caused by pandemic-related travel restrictions. Since petitioner had no statutory obligation to file returns for immovable property sale transactions as non-resident, and demonstrated bona fide reasons for delay, respondent should have exercised discretionary jurisdiction under Section 119(2)(b) liberally. Denial would result in unjust enrichment of revenue and undue hardship to petitioner entitled to lawful refund. While CBDT Circular No. 9 of 2015 precludes interest on delayed refund, petitioner retains substantive right to principal refund amount per equity and good conscience principles.
HC allowed petition filed by NRI petitioner seeking TDS refund despite delayed ITR filing. Petitioner, residing in London and Northern Ireland with OCI status, contended Covid-19 pandemic and travel restrictions prevented timely consultation with Indian tax advisors for filing returns. Court held respondent failed to consider petitioner's non-resident status and genuine hardship caused by pandemic-related travel restrictions. Since petitioner had no statutory obligation to file returns for immovable property sale transactions as non-resident, and demonstrated bona fide reasons for delay, respondent should have exercised discretionary jurisdiction under Section 119(2)(b) liberally. Denial would result in unjust enrichment of revenue and undue hardship to petitioner entitled to lawful refund. While CBDT Circular No. 9 of 2015 precludes interest on delayed refund, petitioner retains substantive right to principal refund amount per equity and good conscience principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
