Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT upheld several key rulings against the Revenue's appeals. The Tribunal dismissed multiple grounds raised by the tax department, including challenges to discount calculations, alleged bogus purchases, unexplained loans, and undisclosed cash receipts. Notably, the ITAT found insufficient evidence to substantiate the Assessing Officer's allegations of on-money receipts and deemed dividends. The Tribunal consistently emphasized the need for concrete proof and rejected ad hoc additions. Most significantly, the ITAT supported the CIT(A)'s findings, finding no material to disturb previous deletions of tax additions. The Revenue's appeals were systematically dismissed across various grounds, reinforcing procedural fairness and evidentiary standards in tax assessment.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
