Reassessment under s.148A held valid; s.69 additions totaling Rs.7,00,000 deleted after acceptable contemporaneous explanations for property investmen...
No Records Found
Page of 4316
1 to 20 of 86308 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 3000
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC allowed the petition challenging a statutory notice, finding that the jurisdictional requirements for invoking Section 74 were not satisfied. The court determined that the notice lacked essential ingredients of fraud, wilful misstatement, or material fact suppression. The notice's language referenced Section 73 and sought further explanation, indicating an absence of preconditions necessary to invoke Section 74. Consequently, the court held the notice was procedurally invalid and unsustainable, thereby granting relief to the petitioner by nullifying the challenged notice.
HC allowed the petition challenging a statutory notice, finding that the jurisdictional requirements for invoking Section 74 were not satisfied. The court determined that the notice lacked essential ingredients of fraud, wilful misstatement, or material fact suppression. The notice's language referenced Section 73 and sought further explanation, indicating an absence of preconditions necessary to invoke Section 74. Consequently, the court held the notice was procedurally invalid and unsustainable, thereby granting relief to the petitioner by nullifying the challenged notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick
reference only.
TaxTMI 
https://www.taxtmi.com/hi...
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
