Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
HC determined that a company engaged in manufacturing, incurring expenditure on scientific research and in-house R&D facility approved by the competent authority, is eligible for a 200% deduction under Section 35(2AB)(1). The court rejected the argument of 'work-in-progress' as a disqualifying factor, noting the statutory provision only speaks of 'expenditure' without distinguishing between completed and ongoing research. The petitioner was entitled to claim benefits for the actual year of expenditure incurrence, particularly given the reliance on prior advisory guidance. The court found in favor of the petitioner, allowing the deduction claim for scientific research expenditure.